Prospective cohort study evaluates the impact of chronotype, genetic risk, and lifestyle on depression and anxiety outcomes.
We aimed to evaluate associations of chronotype, genetic risk, and lifestyle with depression and anxiety. A total of 242,391 participants without anxiety and depression at baseline in UK Biobank were included. During a total of 3,393,260.1 and 1,371,872.8 person‐years follow‐up, we found 11,824 (4.88%) incident depression and 10,051 (4.15%) incident anxiety cases, respectively. Compared with definite morning group, individuals with intermediate (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04‒1.13) and definite evening chronotype (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.36‒1.55) have higher risks of depression, and individuals with definite evening chronotype (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.18‒1.37) have a higher risk of anxiety. We found joint association between chronotype and genetic risk, those with high genetic risk and definite evening chronotype had the highest risk of depression (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.81‒2.23) and anxiety (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.24‒1.58). We also found joint association between chronotype and lifestyle, those with least healthy lifestyle and definite evening chronotype had the highest risk of depression (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.65‒2.40) and anxiety (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.36‒2.10). Individuals with evening chronotype are associated with higher risks of depression and anxiety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: