Analysis shows a new model maximizes reliability and minimizes costs in engineering projects, indicating significant improvements over traditional methods.
Reliability optimization is a critical area of research, with the Redundancy Allocation Problem (RAP) being one of its central challenges. Since many engineering projects emphasize cost-effectiveness, it is essential to incorporate total system cost as a key optimization objective. This paper proposes a bi-objective RAP that simultaneously maximizes system reliability and minimizes system cost. In the proposed model, the redundancy strategy of each subsystem is treated as a decision variable –selectable among active, standby, or mixed configurations– and component allocation is flexible, allowing a combination of non-identical components within subsystems. To generate a set of optimal trade-off solutions (the Pareto front), an efficient metaheuristic approach known as Fast Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm is employed, along with a procedure for identifying the most suitable solution from the Pareto set. The performance of the algorithm is validated using a benchmark problem and a large-scale example. The results show that, despite variations in the initial populations, the final Pareto-optimal sets exhibit minimal differences, demonstrating the robustness of the algorithm. Moreover, the wide variation in cost and reliability among the non-dominated solutions highlights the algorithm’s ability to capture diverse optimal trade-offs. Comparative analysis further confirms that the proposed bi-objective model produces solutions with higher reliability and lower cost than existing single-objective approaches, emphasizing its effectiveness in applications where cost efficiency is critical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gholinezhad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: