Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional evaluation shows strong validity and reliability of MobQoL-7D in adults with mobility impairments, suggesting its usefulness.
Background: The Mobility and Quality of Life-7 Dimension (MobQoL-7D) is a new patient-reported outcome measure for mobility-related quality of life. Our aim was to translate and test a Dutch-language version. Methods: A cross-sectional psychometric evaluation study was undertaken. The sampling frame was community-dwelling adults living in the Netherlands who had a long-term (>6 months) mobility impairment. Participants were recruited through a Dutch research agency, and data were collected via online survey. Statistical and psychometric analyses were undertaken to assess the interpretability, validity and reliability of the MobQoL-7D Dutch, including assessment of missing data, floor/ceiling effects, test–retest reliability, structural validity, known-group validity and convergent validity. Results: n = 308 respondents completed the survey; sub-group sample sizes ranged from n = 29 to n = 87. No issues with missing data were found. Despite ceiling effects per item (ranging from 23.1% to 56.5%), there were no floor/ceiling effects for overall index values (12.3% and 0%, respectively). The findings show excellent test–retest reliability of the index value over a two-week period (n = 37; ICC = 0.95), and potential discriminative ability to detect differences between known groups. Factor analyses confirmed unidimensionality. Conclusions: The results provide promising evidence of the validity and reliability of the MobQoL-7D Dutch; further research is needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snijders et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: