Retrospective evaluation of oral supplementation effects on retinal structure and vision in inherited retinal dystrophies, suggesting potential benefits.
Objectives: To evaluate the long-term effects on retinal structure and visual function of oral bromelain and curcumin supplementation in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) complicated by persistent cystoid macular oedema (CMO). Methods: We retrospectively studied 20 eyes with genetically confirmed IRD complicated by CMO, with refractory to systemic or local treatments performed for 6 months. We collected baseline (V1) and follow-up (V2) data from these IRD-CMO patients, who were continuously supplemented with oral bromelain and curcumin for 12 months. Outcome measures were the Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) values, collected by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Based on OCT scans, we classified IRD-CMO as microcystic or macrocystic, performing this sub-grouping in two eye cohorts (n = 10). Baseline median BCVA and CMT differences in both groups were verified (Mann–Whitney test). For both CMO groups, changes from V1 to V2 in median BCVA and CMT values were evaluated (Friedman test). Results: At baseline, both the median BCVA and CMT values were significantly different in both groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001). Between V1 and V2, in the microcystic CMO group, a slightly improved median BCVA was found, whereas the median CMT was reduced; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.6 and p = 0.2, respectively). In the macrocystic CMO group, a significant stable median BCVA was found from V1 to V2, with concomitant significant reduction in median CMT (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). Conclusions: Retinal structural improvement and visual function preservation were observed after oral bromelain and curcumin supplementation in macrocystic IRD-CMO. It is likely that the vasogenic component in macrocystic CMO is more responsive to nutraceutical molecules than the degenerative microcystic component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Andrea et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: