Quantifying Structural Divergence Between Human and Diffusion-Based Generative Visual Compositions

The rapid proliferation of text-to-image generative systems has transformed visual content production, yet the structural characteristics embedded in their compositional outputs remain insufficiently understood. Rather than approaching human–AI differentiation as a purely classification problem, this study investigates whether a controlled set of AI-generated and human-designed posters exhibits measurable structural divergence under thematically matched conditions. A dataset of jazz festival posters was analyzed using interpretable geometric and information-theoretic descriptors, including spatial density (padding ratio), edge density, chromatic dispersion, and entropy-based measures. Instead of relying on deep neural detection architectures, we employed a transparent machine-learning framework to examine intrinsic structural separability within feature space. Results demonstrated highly stable group separation (ROC-AUC = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.978–0.999) under cross-validated evaluation. Distributional analysis further revealed a pronounced divergence in spatial density allocation (Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic = 0.76, p < 10−28), accompanied by a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.365). While padding ratio emerged as the dominant discriminative factor, additional entropy- and chromatic-based descriptors contributed to group separation even when spatial density was excluded (AUC = 0.903). These findings indicate that AI-generated and human-designed posters can diverge in negative space allocation and chromatic organization under controlled thematic and platform-specific conditions. The study contributes to the explainable analysis of generative visual systems by reframing human–AI differentiation as a structural divergence problem grounded in interpretable image statistics rather than as a model-specific artifact detection task.