Automated leaf segmentation improves phenotyping, indicating a scalable solution for crop breeding.
Accurate plant phenotyping is essential for crop breeding and the development of health monitoring systems. Traditional phenotyping methods, such as visual observation and leaf counting, are inefficient and labor-intensive. Although automated approaches are more efficient, they still require extensive labeled datasets for training segmentation networks, which can be costly and time-consuming to prepare. This paper builds on Williams et al. and uses SAM for initial segmentation, then compares two approaches for selecting leaf segments: geometric and color-based filtering with automatically determined thresholds, and a lightweight CNN trained on minimal data. The CNN method delivers superior performance, with an Average Recall AR 75 of 63 % and an Average Precision AP 75 of 58 % (IoU threshold = 75 %) using only four training images, and minimal annotation work. These findings highlight the potential of combining SAM with CNN-based filtering for robust plant phenotyping applications, offering a scalable solution that makes advanced phenotyping more accessible and less dependent on extensive data preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiedler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: