Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores how micro-polluted river water affects soil nitrogen and microbial diversity in paddy fields under different irrigation modes, suggesting strategies for sustainable agriculture.
This study aims to explore the effects of micro-polluted river water on nitrogen and microbial communities of paddy field soil under different irrigation modes. The experiment was conducted in a water-saving park in Nanjing. By establishing three water quality conditions—clean water, micro-polluted river water, and alternating irrigation—and two moisture conditions—flood irrigation and controlled irrigation—this study investigates the effects of different irrigation patterns on soil nitrogen and microbial communities. The results indicate that, under flood irrigation, the input of micro-polluted river water can effectively alleviate NH4+-N loss during the heading stages of rice growth by 49.3%. Moisture conditions are the primary factor influencing microbial community structure. Although the input of micro-polluted river water reduces community stability, rotation irrigation can increase microbial abundance and enhance network complexity, thereby enhancing the system’s resilience. Redundancy analysis shows that soil moisture, pH, and ion content are the key environmental factors driving microbial distribution. The clean and polluted water rotation irrigation model performs best in maintaining soil nitrogen and microbial health. Rotation irrigation promotes the enrichment of key functional groups, such as Actinobacteria, effectively increasing rice yield. This study provides a theoretical basis for promoting sustainable agricultural production through water resource management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: