Secondary analysis examines how internalizing and externalizing problems affect student well-being and academic performance.
Prior research has demonstrated that youth internalizing and externalizing problems significantly correlate with youths’ psychosocial and academic outcomes. However, only a few studies have used data from self-report school-based mental health screenings to explore the empirical relationships among these variables. Moreover, most studies investigate self-reported internalizing or externalizing problems, without considering the relative effects of both kinds of problems together. This study addressed these issues in the literature by conducting a secondary analysis of naturalistic data from school-wide mental health screenings across two secondary schools ( N = 1880) within a suburban school district in the western United States. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the contributions of self-reported internalizing and externalizing screening scores on concurrent levels of student well-being and academic problems. Findings indicated that both internalizing and externalizing screenings were substantial predictors of both student well-being and academic problems and that, compared to internalizing problems, externalizing problems were a much stronger predictor of academic problems. Implications for practice, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: