Mini-review examines CeO2's architecture in dye-wastewater purification, suggesting a route-architecture-function relationship.
Cerium dioxide (CeO2) has emerged as a structurally versatile oxide for dye-wastewater purification because its architecture, porosity, and surface accessibility can be tuned over a wide range while maintaining good chemical stability and environmental compatibility. Recent studies show that template-free or low-template routes can generate porous, mesoporous, multilayered, and flower-like CeO2 architectures with rapid dye uptake and, in some systems, adsorption-assisted photocatalytic removal. However, CeO2-based dye removal has often been discussed either within broad surveys of environmental applications or from composition-centered viewpoints, whereas the more fundamental question is how synthesis route controls architecture formation and how architecture, in turn, governs adsorption and subsequent removal behavior. This mini-review addresses that question from a morphology-centered perspective. It first examines template-free and low-template routes for constructing structured CeO2, then discusses how porosity, hierarchical assembly, and surface accessibility regulate adsorption kinetics and equilibrium capacity in dye-containing aqueous systems. It further considers adsorption-assisted photocatalytic removal and argues that dark adsorption should be regarded as the structural first step rather than a secondary contribution. On this basis, the review shows that rare-earth doping in these systems is most usefully understood as a secondary tuning strategy that refines an already favorable host architecture by modifying surface interaction, optical response, or reactive-species generation. Overall, the available evidence indicates that CeO2-based dye-wastewater purification is most meaningfully interpreted through a route–architecture–function framework in which morphology defines the host, adsorption organizes the local reaction environment, and doping serves mainly as structure-assisted tuning. This perspective shifts the design logic of CeO2 from empirical performance optimization toward rational structure-directed construction of integrated removal platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: