Research reveals a dynamic inversion method for analyzing shock responses in structures, indicating new avenues for shock safety assessments.
In response to the problem that sensors cannot be directly installed at key local positions on the surface of ship hull structures during the transient strong shock process of underwater explosions due to spatial constraints or large plastic deformations, this paper investigates the chaotic-like nonlinear transient behavior of structural dynamic response systems under strong shock and proposes a key position structural response reconstruction method based on dynamic inversion. Since the structural response under a transient strong shock exhibits significant non-stationarity and nonlinearity, signals from neighboring measurement points cannot directly characterize the dynamic behavior at key positions. Therefore, the shock response signals are discretized in both time and space dimensions. The phase space reconstruction method is employed to characterize the motion trajectory of acceleration responses in a two-dimensional phase space, establish mapping functions for system motion evolution, and use their control parameters to characterize the system’s nonlinear dynamic behavior. Furthermore, based on the spatiotemporal dynamic equations, a spatiotemporal coupled mapping model for spatial state points is established to achieve the theoretical inversion of acceleration responses at key positions. This method provides theoretical support for analyzing the dynamic characteristics of structures at key positions under strong shock environments, characterizing the shock environment, and assessing and designing equipment for shock safety. However, the current validation is based on high-fidelity numerical simulations rather than physical prototype tests; therefore, the predictive capability of this method in actual physical environments requires further validation through subsequent physical model tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: