Tests a framework for quantifying convective responses to temperature and humidity in climate models, suggesting improved accuracy in simulations.
Convection parameterization is a leading source of uncertainty in global and regional climate models, and a lack of ground truth complicates the assessment of convection scheme performance. Here we test a linear framework for quantifying convective responses, using two models run at convection‐permitting resolution, to examine model responses to temperature and humidity perturbations. For the models examined, a grid spacing finer than ∼1 km was required for consistent (hence potentially accurate) responses, implying good representation of convectively‐coupled dynamics. The results from the tests at 100 and 250 m grid spacing could reasonably be used in idealized tests of convective schemes, as their spread is mostly small compared to the spread of previously reported scheme behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raupach et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: