Key result
Adequate delivery sheath support eliminates lead endocardial entanglement during LBBAP vs. ~70% without support.
Why the study?
Does delivery system support prevent endocardial entanglement and delamination during left bundle branch area pacing in human hearts?
Does delivery system support prevent endocardial entanglement and delamination during left bundle branch area pacing in human hearts?
Adequate delivery system support providing coaxiality and counterforce effect effectively prevents endocardial entanglement and facilitates lumenless screw-in lead penetration during left bundle branch area pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delivery system support may prevent endocardial entanglement in left bundle branch area pacing; leaves open in vivo clinical translation.
Background: The mechanisms behind endocardial entanglement and resultant delamination during left bundle branch area pacing, as well as potential solutions, have not been fully demonstrated in the human heart. Methods: Active fixation of a lumenless screw-in lead into the right ventricular septum was attempted with or without delivery system support using donor human hearts rejected for transplant. Delivery sheath support was ensured through firm catheter support maintained by a fixed clip. Endocardial entanglement, endocardial delamination after unscrewing, and lead penetration were evaluated using both macroscopic and microscopic analyses. Results: Each of 10 lead deployments with or without support was attempted using 4 donor human hearts. There was a higher incidence of endocardial entanglement and resultant helix-only penetration in the nonsupport group than the support group (70% versus 0%). Unscrewing after the endocardial entanglement consistently revealed extensively delaminated endocardium entwined around the helix. The median endocardial delamination area was larger in the entanglement group than in the nonentanglement group (25.0 mm 2 versus 0.9 mm 2 , P <0.001). In the regions with endocardial entanglement, histological analysis confirmed extensive endocardial delamination with minimal myocardial injury. On the other hand, localized endocardial delamination and deep intramural penetration were observed in the regions without entanglement. Screw-in procedures reattempted into the regions with extensive endocardial delamination following entanglement achieved deep penetration even without delivery system support. Conclusions: Endocardial entanglement and delamination were confirmed in donor human hearts. Adequate delivery system support, particularly its coaxiality and counterforce effect, is likely to prevent endocardial entanglement and facilitate effective penetration of a lumenless screw-in lead into the human ventricular septum.
Miyazaki et al. (2026) studied Left bundle branch area pacing (n=4). Delivery system support (firm catheter support maintained by a fixed clip) vs. Without delivery system support was evaluated on Incidence of endocardial entanglement and resultant helix-only penetration. Adequate delivery system support completely prevented endocardial entanglement during left bundle branch area pacing lead deployment compared to a 70% incidence without support.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: