Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A tertiary centre experience reports long-term outcomes in selected patients, highlighting the need for larger studies.
EPSIT is a minimally invasive approach with promising long-term results when carefully selected patients are treated by trained surgeons. However, high attrition rates limit interpretation. Larger comparative studies with standardised outcome definitions and inclusion of patient-reported outcomes (pain and cosmesis) are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: