Framework proposes pre-transaction interventions to prevent crypto investment fraud on social platforms, suggesting improved safety measures.
This paper proposes a structural framework for detecting and interrupting crypto investment fraud on social platforms before financial loss occurs. Existing platform responses often treat fraud as isolated deceptive posts, malicious links, or account-level violations. This paper argues that such framing is insufficient because many real-world scams unfold as staged behavioral sequences rather than single artifacts. The proposed framework models crypto investment fraud as a multi-step conversion process involving initial contact, trust-building, migration into direct messages or off-platform messaging apps, low-friction financial solicitation, proof-of-profit theatrics, escalating transfer requests, and eventual withdrawal obstruction. On this basis, the paper introduces a pre-transaction intervention architecture composed of five components: sequence-based detection, graph-based coordination analysis, graduated friction interventions, registry-aware verification for financial solicitation, and structured victim-report intake. The paper further argues that sequence-based modeling is more robust than post-level moderation against linguistic evasion and surface-level variation, because scammers can rewrite words more easily than they can conceal the underlying conversion structure. It also identifies several deployment-oriented research challenges, including pre-migration prediction under off-platform observability loss, dynamic infrastructure-reuse analysis, cold-start transfer from adjacent scam archetypes, and adversarial sequence adaptation. More broadly, the paper suggests that platform safety should be evaluated not only by how effectively a system removes harmful content, but by how early it can interrupt harmful conversion processes before irreversible loss occurs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroko Konishi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: