Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Traditional Visual Question Answering (VQA) models have a significant limitation: they cannot remember the latest external world knowledge, nor use it. Although Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can solve the problems of hallucination, current researches are focuses on the massive, computation-heavy models, which prevents us from knowing whether RAG is effective in resource constrained environment. This paper presents a comprehensive study of building a light multi modal RAG (MM-RAG) pipeline on consumer-grade hardware. Specifically, this study made a comparative study between two small language models: TinyLlama (1.1B) and Qwen 2.5(3B). The results of research demonstrate that, first, with the access of RAG, the accuracy of outcome results has a significant increase (of about 13%-16%) compared to zero-shot baselines, despite the scale of models. Second, which is the most important, this study identifies a verbosity failure of those instruction-tuned small language models (SLMs), which are more likely to generate output noise and leads to low evaluation marks. To address this, this research developed a post processing protocol, recovering the accuracy of Qwen from 8% to 52.6%. These findings illustrate that for edge-deployed VQA systems, rigorous output alignment is as critical as the retrieval mechanism itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Runkai Dong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: