PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics0 citationsOpen Access

Fused ensembles of dynamic-rupture earthquake simulations to accelerate Bayesian inference

VKVikas KurapatiDSDavid SchnellerLSLinus Seelinger

Key Points

  • The central aim is to enhance the efficiency of Bayesian inference in earthquake simulations by using fused ensemble methods.
  • Implemented fused ensemble simulations to accelerate earthquake simulation workflows.
  • Utilized high-performance computing software SeisSol with ADER-DG scheme.
  • Compared different implementation variants for non-linear dynamic rupture and material plasticity modeling.
  • Fused simulations achieved speedups up to 5.54 times faster than single executions.
  • Demonstrated a speedup of 1.6 for a complete uncertainty quantification workflow.
  • Resulted in 36% savings in node hours for the entire workflow.

Abstract

Abstract Understanding earthquake dynamics is essential for seismic hazard assessment and risk mitigation. In this context, Bayesian inference provides valuable insights into model parameters by combining simulation models with real-world data. Such Bayesian parameter inference with uncertainty quantification (UQ) requires numerous simulation runs and is therefore often computationally infeasible. Already, a single high-fidelity earthquake simulation – governed by a linear hyperbolic seismic wave equation coupled nonlinearly to a friction law and plastic deformation – is computationally expensive. In this study, we investigate the use of fused ensemble simulations to accelerate large earthquake simulation workflows and UQ studies. We implement and evaluate this approach in SeisSol, a high-performance computing software for the simulation of complex earthquake events that uses an Arbitrary high-order DERivative Discontinuous Galerkin (ADER-DG) scheme. Via fused ensembles, we turn the element-local small sparse/dense matrix operations into tensor contractions working on a dense rank-3 tensor and sparse matrices. These are again executed via loops of small, sparse/dense matrix operations, but with better computational efficiency, due to better exploitation of SIMD instructions on CPUs. We also compare two implementation variants (with different implementation effort) for kernels modeling non-linear dynamic rupture and effects of material plasticity. Our results demonstrate that fused simulations can be up to 5.54 times faster than a single execution – though this depends strongly on the discretization order, the problem size, and the compute architecture. For a full UQ example workflow, we demonstrate a speedup of 1.6, resulting in 36% savings in node hours for the entire workflow.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kurapati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e64e78050d08c1b76a5chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-026-00287-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations1979 · 3,100 citations
  2. 2The Design and Performance of Batched BLAS on Modern High-Performance Computing Systems2017 · 85 citations
  3. 3An Efficient Algorithm for Computation of MHD Flow Ensembles2016 · 51 citations
  4. 4SIMD vectorization for simultaneous solution of locally varying linear systems with multiple right-hand sides2023 · 5 citations
  5. 5Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers2010 · 150 citations