In classical poetics, tragedy is defined as the representation of a serious and complete action, traditionally characterized by the exclusion of comic episodes and characters. William Shakespeare, however, disrupts this convention by integrating comic scenes into the very structure of tragic discourse. This paper argues that comic relief in tragedy does not serve a single, uniform function; in Hamlet, it operates as a complex dramaturgical and ideological device. Comic episodes do not merely temper tragic intensity; rather, they open a discursive space in which social hierarchies and mechanisms of institutional control are articulated and critically examined. An analysis of scenes involving Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Osric, and the gravediggers reveals a dynamic hierarchy of comic functions, ranging from courtly comedy aligned with the stabilization of the existing order to carnivalesque forms of laughter that challenge class distinctions and established structures of authority. The theoretical framework of this study is grounded in Bakhtin’s concept of carnivalization and enriched by insights from New Historicism and psychoanalytic theories of humor. This approach enables comic relief in Hamlet to be interpreted as an integral component of the dramatic structure—one that both deepens tragic meaning and exposes the play’s internal ideological contradictions.
Andrejvić et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: