PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Journal of Surfactants and Detergents0 citationsOpen Access

The Binding of Pentadiyl‐α,ω‐Bis(Dimethyldodecylammonium), a Cationic Gemini 12‐5‐12 Surfactant to Conjugated Carboxylates as Organic Counterions

View Full Paper
ARAlexia Albrechtt RíosSaint Mary's College of CaliforniaJSJaslyn SalazarSaint Mary's College of CaliforniaVKValentina KornachSaint Mary's College of California

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the influence of various conjugated carboxylate anions on the critical micelle concentration of a specific cationic surfactant.
  • Measured critical micelle concentration using conductivity, fluorescence intensity, and NMR chemical shifts.
  • Studied nine sodium salts of organic acids as counterions.
  • Analyzed NMR spectra to examine counterion binding at the micellar interface.
  • Demonstrated a direct correlation between Log (CMC) values and Log P values of the counterion.
  • Confirmed that hydrophobicity of carboxylates significantly influences CMC values.
  • Provided a predictive model for surfactant aggregation behavior based on counterion properties.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The critical micelle concentration (CMC) values of the cationic gemini surfactant pentadiyl‐α,ω‐bis(dimethyldodecylammonium) bromide depend on the hydrophobicity of added conjugated organic carboxylate anions. Nine conjugated counterions, present as sodium salts of organic acids, were studied to expand the correlation to the counterion hydrophobicity effect on the CMC. These added salts are sodium benzoate, sodium o‐fluorobenzoate, sodium o‐chlorobenzoate, sodium o‐bromobenzoate, sodium 2,6‐difluorobenzoate, sodium 3,5‐difluorobenzoate, sodium cinnamate, sodium 3,5‐difluorocinnamate, and sodium sorbate. Three methods, conductivity, fluorescence intensity, and NMR chemical shifts, were employed to obtain CMC values. 1D and 2D NMR spectra yield data on the counterion binding to the micellar interface. A straightforward correlation of the Log (CMC) values and the Log P values of the organic acid, which was deprotonated to serve as the counterion, demonstrates the Log P values can be utilized to predict the surfactant aggregation behavior over an extensive range.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ríos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e66378050d08c1b76cd3https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.70037
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Aggregation behavior of newly synthesized Gemini cationic surfactants in absence and in presence of different inorganic salts in 15% DMSO–water solvent2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Effect of aquo-organic solvents on the aggregation of hydroxyethyl-based dimeric surfactants2026
  3. 3Variation of the Critical Micelle Concentration with Surfactant Structure2007 · 2 citations
  4. 4The Effect of Hydrocarbon Chain Length on the Critical Micelle Concentration of Cationic Surfactants2007 · 1 citations
  5. 5Surface Activity, Aggregation Behavior, Wettability, and Foam Properties of Mixed System of Gemini Cationic Silicon Surfactant and Betaine Hydrocarbon Surfactant in Dilute Solutions2026