PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Journal of Psychology in Africa0 citations

Developmental dynamics between psychological distress and psychological inflexibility in college students: A two-wave cross-lagged panel study

YLYanting LiMHMin HuGuangzhou Sport UniversityJJJin Jiang

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the longitudinal relationships between psychological distress and psychological inflexibility among college students.
  • Two-wave cross-lagged panel study design
  • 391 college students participated through cluster sampling
  • Utilized DASS-21 for distress and AAQ-II for inflexibility assessments
  • Controlled for gender and age in analyses
  • Estimated cross-lagged panel model for predicting effects.
  • Significant concurrent correlations found between distress and inflexibility at both time points
  • Psychological distress at T1 predicted higher inflexibility at T2 (β = 0.155, p = 0.006)
  • Psychological inflexibility at T1 predicted higher distress at T2 (β = 0.186, p < 0.001)
  • Baseline distress was significantly associated with gender.
  • Findings support ACT-based strategies for mental health in young adults.

Abstract

The present study investigated the longitudinal and reciprocal associations between psychological distress and psychological inflexibility among college students. A total of 391 participants (77.2% male; age = 20.31, SD = 0.90) were recruited through cluster sampling, completed the DASS-21 (21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) and AAQ-II (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II) at two time points (T1: March 2024; T2: October 2024). After establishing longitudinal measurement invariance, a cross-lagged panel model was estimated while controlling for gender and age. Results from cross-lagged panel modeling (CLPM) revealed significant concurrent correlations between psychological distress and psychological inflexibility at both time points, as well as reciprocal predictive effects: T1 psychological distress significantly predicted higher T2 psychological inflexibility (β = 0.155, p = 0.006), and T1 psychological inflexibility significantly predicted higher T2 psychological distress (β = 0.186, p < 0.001). Gender was also significantly associated with baseline distress. These findings highlight the developmental interplay between psychological distress and psychological inflexibility consistent with the core assumptions of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). These findings provide empirical support for prevention and intervention strategies grounded in ACT-based approaches, such as acceptance, mindfulness, and values-oriented action, to promote mental health in young adulthood.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e67a78050d08c1b76d71https://doi.org/10.32604/jpa.2026.073569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper