PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Psychology and Marketing2 citationsOpen Access

Surprise Marketing

View Full Paper
XLXin‐Jean LimWLWeng Marc LimPTPark Thaichon

Key Points

  • This research aims to fill the gap in understanding surprise marketing through a comprehensive framework and analysis.
  • Introduces the PIEL framework comprising four components: Probabilistic outcomes, Intentional design, Exclusive ownership, Low stake offerings.
  • Analyzes contemporary marketing studies and marketplace practices related to surprise marketing.
  • Examines the evolution of surprise marketing through the phases of emergence, engagement, and immersion.
  • Identifies the dual effects of surprise marketing in evoking positive emotions while increasing consumer vulnerability and skepticism.
  • Proposes investigating surprise marketing's role in social change and ethical concerns surrounding dynamic pricing.
  • Highlights the need for more effective, inclusive, and sustainable practices in the field.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Surprise marketing, characterized by unexpected tactics such as blind boxes and spontaneous discounts, captivates consumers by sparking curiosity and participation. Despite increasing industry use, scholarly research remains fragmented and limited. This article addresses this gap by introducing the PIEL framework for surprise marketing, which integrates four core tenets: Probabilistic (outcomes), Intentional (design), Exclusive (ownership), and Low stake (offerings). Drawing from a comprehensive analysis of contemporary marketing studies and marketplace practices, this article examines the evolution of surprise marketing across the strategic phases of emergence , engagement , and immersion in response to evolving phygital trends and shifting consumer expectations. The analysis identifies the duality inherent in surprise marketing, wherein its ability to evoke powerful positive emotions can paradoxically heighten consumer vulnerability, skepticism, and perceived unfairness. This article further outlines critical gaps and proposes meaningful directions, including investigating surprise marketing as a catalyst for social change, enhancing inclusivity in its applications, addressing ethical concerns around dynamic pricing, examining its impact on consumer wellbeing, and understanding the cognitive‐behavioral complexities of paradoxical emotions. These insights, in turn, should lead to a better understanding of surprise marketing, thereby guiding more effective, equitable, and sustainable practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e67a78050d08c1b76d94https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper