PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Processes1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Acid-Activated Hydrochar Under Different Feedstocks

View Full Paper
LMLuisa F. Medina-GanemNVNeali Valencia-EspinozaEBEduardo Bautista-Peñuelas

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the environmental and functional differences of hydrochars produced from various feedstocks under acid treatment.
  • Utilized hydrothermal carbonization to produce hydrochars from sugarcane and agave bagasse.
  • Characterized materials using FT-IR, TGA, BET, and XRD analyses.
  • Conducted life cycle assessment on hydrochars produced with varying concentrations of H2SO4.
  • Performed adsorption experiments to assess dye removal efficiency.
  • Agave bagasse hydrochars retained more crystalline structures than sugarcane bagasse hydrochars.
  • HBA samples showed greater availability of –SO3H groups with increasing acid concentration.
  • Agave bagasse treated with 0.5 M H2SO4 achieved 75.7% mass yield and 94.5% dye removal.
  • Life cycle assessment highlighted significant emission reduction with the optimized hydrochar.

Abstract

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of agricultural waste is a promising waste management technique. However, the use of different raw materials may produce hydrochars with varying efficiencies, both in yield and application, and environmental impacts, due to differences in composition and required processing conditions. To understand the influence of biomass type and acid-assisted HTC conditions, this study used sugarcane and agave bagasse to produce functionalized hydrochars and evaluated them for the removal of Reactive Orange 84; an azo dye used in the textile industry. Material characterization was performed using FT-IR, TGA, BET, and XRD analyses. In addition, a life cycle assessment was conducted to evaluate environmental impacts associated with hydrochars produced using H2SO4 at concentrations of 0.2 and 0.5 M. TGA and XRD results indicate that agave bagasse hydrochars (HBA) retain more crystalline lignocellulosic structures, whereas sugarcane bagasse hydrochars (HBS) exhibit predominantly amorphous structures after HTC. FT-IR analysis confirmed the presence of –SO3H functional groups; however, HBA samples showed greater availability of these groups with increasing acid concentration. Adsorption experiments and LCA results demonstrated that the most favorable treatment, in terms of emission reduction and dye removal, was agave bagasse functionalized with 0.5 M H2SO4, achieving 75.7% mass yield and 94.5% dye removal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Medina-Ganem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e67a78050d08c1b76ee7https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14081200
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper