Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Methods to automatically analyze media content are advancing significantly. Among others, it has become increasingly popular to analyze the framing of news articles by means of statistical procedures. In this article, we investigate the conceptual validity of news frames that are inferred by a combination of k-means cluster analysis and automatic sentiment analysis. Furthermore, we test a way of improving statistical frame analysis such that revealed clusters of articles reflect the framing concept more closely. We do so by only using words from an article’s title and lead and by excluding named entities and words with a certain part of speech from the analysis. To validate revealed frames, we manually analyze samples of articles from the extracted clusters. Findings of our tests indicate that when following the proposed feature selection approach, the resulting clusters more accurately discriminate between articles with a different framing. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of our findings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Burscher et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69da2556ba6014a02e8361f1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596385
Björn Burscher
University of Amsterdam
Rens Vliegenthart
Wageningen University & Research
Claes H. de Vreese
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Social Science Computer Review
University of Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...