Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A significant resistance to CO₂ diffusion is imposed by mesophyll tissue inside leaves. Mesophyll resistance, rm (or its reciprocal, mesophyll conductance, gm ), reduces the rate at which Rubisco can fix CO₂ , increasing the water and nitrogen costs of carbon acquisition. gm varies in proportion to the surface area of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular airspace per unit leaf area. It also depends on the thickness and effective porosity of the cell wall and the CO₂ permeabilities of membranes. As no measurements exist for the effective porosity of mesophyll cell walls, and CO₂ permeability values are too low to account for observed rates of CO₂ assimilation, conclusions from modelling must be treated with caution. There is great variation in the mesophyll resistance per unit chloroplast area for a given cell wall thickness, which may reflect differences in effective porosity. While apparent gm can vary with CO₂ and irradiance, the underlying conductance at the cellular level may remain unchanged. Dynamic changes in apparent gm arise for spatial reasons and because chloroplasts differ in their photosynthetic composition and operate in different light environments. Measurements of the temperature sensitivity of membrane CO₂ permeability are urgently needed to explain variation in temperature responses of gm .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John R. Evans (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: