Since 2013 an average of six articles per year concern robot initiatives in dentistry, mostly originating from East Asia (57%). The vast majority of research was categorized as either basic theoretical or basic applied research (80%). Technology readiness levels did not reach higher than three (proof of concept) in 55% of all articles. In 84%, the first author of the included articles had a technical background and in 36%, none of the authors had a dental or medical background. The overall quality of literature, especially in terms of clinical validation, should be considered as low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riet et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: