The capability of the NCAR 10.6-m-wavelength CO 2 Doppler lidar to measure radial air motion is validated by examining hard-target test data, comparing measurements with those from a two-axis propeller anemometer and a 915-MHz profiling radar, and analyzing power spectra and autocovariance functions of the lidar radial velocities in a daytime convective boundary layer. Results demonstrate that the lidar is capable of measuring radial velocity to less than 0.5 m s 1 precision from 20 laser pulse averages under high signal-to-noise ratio conditions. Hard-target test data and comparisons with other sensors show that the lidar data can be biased by as much as 2 m s 1 when operating in the coherent oscillator mode and that correlated errors are negligible. Correlation coefficients are as large as 0.96 for 90-min comparisons of horizontal velocities averaged for 1 min from the lidar and anemometer, and 0.87 for 2.5-h comparisons between vertical velocities averaged for 30 s from the lidar and profiler. Comparisons of the lidar and profiler vertical velocities are particularly encouraging for the profiler since these results show that 915-MHz profilers are capable of making good vertical velocity measurements in strong convective boundary layers. The authors conclude that despite the commonplace systematic bias in lidar radial velocity, ground-based operation of the NCAR CO 2 Doppler lidar can provide valuable velocity data for meso-and microscale meteorological studies. The lidar can also provide filtered velocity statistics that may be useful for boundary layer turbulence research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayor et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: