Actinomycin D (ACTD) binding propensities of DNA with CXG trinucleotide repeats were investigated using oligomers of the form d[AT(CXG)n = 2-4AT] and their corresponding heteroduplexes, where X = A, C, G, or T. These oligonucleotides contain -CXGCXG-, -CXGCXGCXG-, and -CXGCXGCXGCXG- units that can form homoduplexes containing one, two, and three GpC binding sites, respectively, with flanking X/X mismatches. The corresponding heteroduplexes contain these same sites with flanking Watson-Crick base pairs. It was found that oligomers with X = G exhibit weak ACTD affinities whereas those with X not equal to G and n = 3 exhibit unusually strong ACTD binding affinities with binding constants ranging from 2.3 x 10(7) to 3.3 x 10(7) M-1 and binding densities of approximately 1 drug molecule/strand (or 2/duplex). These binding affinities are considerably higher than those of their shorter and longer counterparts and are about 2- and 10-fold stronger than the corresponding CAG.CTG and CGG.CCG heteroduplexes, respectively. The CTG-containing oligomer d[AT(CTG)3AT] stands out as unique in having its ACTD dissociation kinetics being dominated by a strikingly slow process with a characteristic time of 205 min at 20 degrees C, which is 100-fold slower than d[AT(CAG)3AT], nearly 10-fold slower than the corresponding heteroduplex, and considerably slower than d[AT(CTG)2AT] (63 min) and d[AT(CTG)4AT] (16 min). The faster dissociation rate of the n = 4 oligomer compared to its n = 2 counterpart is in apparent contrast with the observed 10-fold stronger ACTD binding affinity of the former. It was also found that d[AT(CCG)3AT] exhibits the slowest dissociation rate of the CGG/CCG series, being more than an order of magnitude slower than that of its heteroduplex (tau slow of 43 vs 2 min). The finding that a homoduplex d[AT-CXG-CXG-CXG-AT]2 can bind two ACTD molecules tightly is significant since it was thought unlikely for two consecutive GpC sites separated by a single T/T mismatch to do so.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu-Ming Chen (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: