The necessity of quantising the gravitational field is still subject to an open debate. In this paper we compare the approach of quantum gravity, with that of a fundamentally semi-classical theory of gravity, in the weak-field non-relativistic limit. We show that, while in the former case the Schrödinger equation stays linear, in the latter case one ends up with the so-called Schrödinger–Newton equation, which involves a nonlinear, non-local gravitational contribution. We further discuss that the Schrödinger–Newton equationdoes not describe the collapse of the wave-function, although it was initially proposed for exactly this purpose. Together with the standard collapse postulate, fundamentally semi- classical gravity gives rise to superluminal signalling. A consistent fundamen- tally semi-classical theory of gravity can therefore only be achieved together with a suitable prescription of the wave-function collapse. We further discuss, how collapse models avoid such superluminal signalling and compare the nonlinearities appearing in these models with those in the Schrödinger–Newton equation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahrami et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: