Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates how the history of interaction between organizations and between organizational boundary spanners contributes to the formation of trust between firms. Our findings, using data on the supplier–buyer relationships of two major US auto manufacturers, suggest that history affects trust formation in a complex non‐linear fashion, involving a period of ambivalence early in a relationship. We show that certain kinds of exchange partners can systematically reap differential returns from a common history of interaction. Organizational similarity significantly enhances the ability of exchange partners to translate the benefits of the joint history of interaction into a stock of trust.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulati et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: