PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 5, 2023Journal of Prosthodontics19 citationsOpen Access

Interproximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

View Full Paper
MSMoamen ShebaFFFranciele FlorianiANArthur Nimmo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Based on the results of the included studies, the prevalence of ICL was high, occurring more frequently at the mesial contact. There were no significant differences in relation to age, gender, and arch location.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sheba et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dabab74a1e15904c835e56https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13780
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis2021 · 34 citations
  2. 2The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: A retrospective study2020 · 32 citations
  3. 3Retention and relapse in clinical practice2017 · 202 citations
  4. 4A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis2010 · 6,939 citations
  5. 5Prevalence of Interproximal Open Contacts Between Single-Implant Restorations and Adjacent Teeth2016 · 64 citations