Why the study?
Residual lipid risk and inflammation persist after myocardial revascularisation, necessitating an updated overview of established and emerging pharmacological strategies for physicians performing CABG or PCI.
This narrative review highlights the importance of comprehensive pharmacological management, including aggressive lipid-lowering and emerging anti-inflammatory therapies, to reduce residual cardiovascular risk after myocardial revascularization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform residual risk strategies after revascularization; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Pharmacological treatment remains vital in the effective management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering therapies, such as statins, have consistently demonstrated robust efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. The introduction of ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors have further strengthened the effectiveness of LDL cholesterol management, particularly in patients who are statin intolerant or who remain at high risk despite maximal tolerated statin therapy. In addition to managing LDL cholesterol, addressing residual lipid risk by targeting elevated triglyceride and lipoprotein(a) levels and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels has emerged as a potentially important therapeutic consideration, as these are increasingly recognised as independent cardiovascular risk factors. Concurrently, inflammation is increasingly acknowledged as a significant contributor to atherogenesis and subsequent cardiovascular events. Clinical trials examining anti-inflammatory therapies, such as colchicine and interleukin-1β inhibitors (e.g., canakinumab), have demonstrated beneficial effects in reducing cardiovascular events independent of lipid modification. This narrative review provides an updated overview targeted specifically at physicians performing coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. It summarises current evidence regarding established lipid-lowering therapies, emerging therapeutic approaches to address residual lipid risk, and the evolving role of anti-inflammatory interventions in the comprehensive management of ASCVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oshima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: