Why the study?
Are the eligibility criteria of the REWIND trial more representative of the real-world UK type 2 diabetes population compared to LEADER and SUSTAIN-6?
Are the eligibility criteria of the REWIND trial more representative of the real-world UK type 2 diabetes population compared to LEADER and SUSTAIN-6?
The REWIND trial population is more generalizable to real-world UK patients with type 2 diabetes than the populations in the LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 trials.
May support broader UK applicability of REWIND results; extends trial representativeness comparisons but leaves generalizability open.
REWIND captured a trial population more representative of the real-world T2D population in the United Kingdom than LEADER or SUSTAIN-6 with regard to both CV and combined CV/core eligibility criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webb et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: