Why the study?
Does ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) improve success rates and reduce performance times compared to traditional approaches for peripheral nerve blockade?
Does ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) improve success rates and reduce performance times compared to traditional approaches for peripheral nerve blockade?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights that ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia improves success rates and reduces performance times compared to traditional nerve stimulator techniques.
Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) for peripheral nerve blockade is becoming increasingly popular. The advantage of ultrasound technology is that it affords the anesthesiologist the real time ability to visualize neural structures, needle advancement, and local anesthetic spread. Recent data suggest that UGRA generates improved success rates and reductions in performance times in comparison to traditional approaches. Further, the use of ultrasound technology in peripheral nerve blocks has provided insight into needle-nerve interactions, revealing distinct limitations of nerve stimulator techniques. Given that UGRA requires a unique set of skills, formal standards and guidelines are currently being developed by leadership societies in order to foster education and training. This review article, in a case vignette format, highlights important techniques, concepts, and limitations regarding the use of ultrasound to facilitate regional anesthesia. Clinically relevant aspects of ultrasound physics are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian Sites (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: