Why the study?
Does BMI-based FRS yield different 10-year CVD risk estimations compared to lipid profile-based FRS in Malaysian adults?
Does BMI-based FRS yield different 10-year CVD risk estimations compared to lipid profile-based FRS in Malaysian adults?
BMI-based Framingham Risk Score yields slightly higher 10-year CVD risk estimates than lipid-based FRS in a Malaysian cohort, suggesting it could be a cost-effective screening alternative.
BMI-based FRS estimates warrant caution in Malaysian risk stratification; leaves open utility as cost-effective lipid-free alternative.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to high morbidity and mortality rate worldwide. Therefore, it is important to determine the risk of CVD across the sociodemographic factors to strategize preventive measures. The current study consisted of 53,122 adults between the ages of 35 and 65 years from The Malaysian Cohort project during recruitment phase from year 2006 to year 2012. Sociodemographic profile and physical activity level were assessed via self-reported questionnaire, whereas relevant CVD-related biomarkers and biophysical variables were measured to determine the Framingham Risk Score (FRS). The main outcome was the 10-year risk of CVD via FRS calculated based on lipid profile and body mass index (BMI) associated formulae. The BMI-based formula yielded a higher estimation of 10-year CVD risk than the lipid profile-based formula in the study for both males (median = 13.2% and 12.7%, respectively) and females (median = 4.3% and 4.2%, respectively). The subgroup with the highest risk for 10-year CVD events (based on both FRS formulae) was the Malay males who have lower education level and low physical activity level. Future strategies for the reduction of CVD risk should focus on screening via BMI-based FRS in this at-risk subpopulation to increase the cost-effectiveness of the prevention initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borhanuddin et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: