This paper investigates the dynamics and integrability of the double spring pendulum, which has great importance in studying nonlinear dynamics , chaos, and bifurcations. Being a Hamiltonian system with three degrees of freedom, its analysis presents a significant challenge. To gain insight into the system’s dynamics, we employ various numerical methods , including Lyapunov exponents spectra, phase-parametric diagrams, and Poincaré cross-sections. The novelty of our work lies in the integration of these three numerical methods into one powerful tool. We provide a comprehensive understanding of the system’s dynamics by identifying parameter values or initial conditions that lead to hyper-chaotic, chaotic, quasi-periodic, and periodic motion, which is a novel contribution in the context of Hamiltonian systems. In the absence of gravitational potential , the system exhibits S 1 symmetry, and the presence of an additional first integral was identified using Lyapunov exponents diagrams. We demonstrate the effective utilization of Lyapunov exponents as a potential indicator of first integrals and integrable dynamics. The numerical analysis is complemented by an analytical proof regarding the non-integrability of the system. This proof relies on the analysis of properties of the differential Galois group of variational equations along specific solutions of the system. To facilitate this analysis, we utilized a newly developed extension of the Kovacic algorithm specifically designed for fourth-order differential equations . Overall, our study sheds light on the intricate dynamics and integrability of the double spring pendulum, offering new insights and methodologies for further research in this field. • A system of the double spring pendulum is examined. • The complexity of the model is demonstrated by a sophisticated combination of various numerical methods . • Lyapunov exponent diagrams are used as indicators of first integrals and integrable dynamics. • A proof of the non-integrability of the studied model within the framework of differential Galois theory is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szumiński et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: