Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates development disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous areas, highlighting implications for policy design.
Persistent intra-state disparities remain a critical barrier to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 10 (reduced inequalities), especially in regions with significant Indigenous populations. This study investigates development gaps between Indigenous-majority and non-Indigenous-majority blocks in Odisha, India, during 1994 and 2021. Employing composite development indices (CDIs) constructed from six key socio-economic indicators across 314 administrative blocks, we apply sigma and beta convergence frameworks to assess spatial and temporal development dynamics. Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition further disentangles the structural drivers of inter-group disparities. Our findings reveal a paradox: while aggregate convergence is evident across Odisha’s blocks, stark and persistent divergence characterises Indigenous versus non-Indigenous areas. Indigenous blocks demonstrate lower development returns on literacy, employment diversification and health infrastructure compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts—indicating that disparities stem not merely from resource deficits but from differential effectiveness of existing endowments. The findings underscore the importance of disaggregated, meso-level analysis in identifying structural bottlenecks and inform the design of region-specific policy interventions aimed at fostering inclusive development. By highlighting persistent exclusion at the sub-state level, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of inequality and convergence in developing regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gual et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: