This article argues for nonreductive explanations in social sciences, highlighting their informative nature.
Building upon the notion of proportionality, this article proposes a line of argument in favor of nonreductive explanations in the social sciences. I argue that many higher-level explanations in the social sciences, i.e., explanations over and above the individual-level, are legitimate explanations insofar as their explanantia are proportional to their given explananda of interest. These higher-level explanations are often favored over their individual-level reductive counterparts because they are strictly more informative than their reductive counterparts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. Fang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: