Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This comparative study examines the mechanical and optoelectronic properties of Mn3GeC and Ni3GeC, indicating their potential applications.
We present a comprehensive first-principles comparative study of the antiperovskite carbides X 3 GeC (X = Mn, Ni) using density functional theory within the all-electron WIEN2k and planewave CASTEP frameworks. Both compounds adopt a cubic Pm3.m structure and satisfy mechanical stability criteria. Optimized lattice parameters are 3.62 Å (Mn 3 GeC) and 3.79 Å (Ni 3 GeC), with corresponding densities of 8.70 and 7.95 g cm −3 . Elastic constant analysis reveals high stiffness for Mn 3 GeC (C 11 = 436.87 GPa, bulk modulus = 235.82 GPa) and pronounced ductility in Ni 3 GeC (C 11 = 304.76 GPa, C 44 = 235.31 GPa). Electronic structure calculations (TB-mBJ and HSE06) indicate metallic behavior with zero band gaps. Optical spectra show strong reflectivity (>45%) in the visible–UV range and distinct plasma resonance features, highlighting potential plasmonic applications. Thermoelectric evaluation reveals negative Seebeck coefficients (−3.0 × 10 −4 V K −1 for Mn 3 GeC; − 2.7 × 10 −4 V K −1 for Ni 3 GeC) with low ZT values. Overall, Mn 3 GeC is mechanically robust, while Ni 3 GeC offers promising optoelectronic and plasmonic functionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: