Narrative review evaluates CEUS for renal mass assessment in CKD, suggesting improved diagnosis and treatment guidance.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly with long-term dialysis exposure and acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD). At the same time, CKD-related architectural distortion and hypoperfusion reduce lesion conspicuity on ultrasound and weaken enhancement-based interpretation on CT and MRI. In advanced CKD, restrictions on iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents further increase the proportion of renal masses that remain indeterminate after conventional imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) addresses the key unmet need in this setting: a safe, direct assessment of microvascular perfusion. Microbubble agents are purely intravascular and non-nephrotoxic, enabling use across all CKD stages and in dialysis patients. By showing real-time enhancement of septa, wall thickening and mural nodules, CEUS distinguishes vascular tumour components from avascular hemorrhagic or proteinaceous material that can mimic enhancement on CT/DECT or signal abnormalities on non-contrast MRI. This capability supports a CEUS-adapted Bosniak approach: lesion categorization is driven by enhancement of septa, wall and nodules rather than by attenuation or T1 hyperintensity of cyst contents, helping avoid misclassification in ACKD. We propose a structured workflow that integrates the triad of CKD stage/eGFR, dialysis status and ACKD with pre- and post-CEUS Bosniak assessment to guide follow-up versus biopsy or nephron-sparing treatment. This article is a narrative review of the literature, complemented by an illustrative clinical case which demonstrates how CEUS can resolve ambiguity when CT/DECT and non-contrast MRI remain inconclusive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eusebi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: