PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Addressing Answer Consistency of Residents in Residential Homes: Experiences From a Mixed Methods Study

MDMarie‐Kristin DöblerKDKatrin Drasch

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the consistency of responses given by older adults in care homes using mixed methods.
  • Conducted 135 semi-structured interviews with individuals aged 50 to 92
  • Focused on individuals in residential homes for the elderly
  • Compared responses to open narrative questions and closed questions on quality of life, decision to move, and cognitive decline.
  • Responses on the same topic generally show consistency among participants
  • Cognitive decline correlates with reduced response consistency
  • Findings support the feasibility of surveying older adults with varying cognitive abilities.

Abstract

This paper addresses two methodological debates: first, it examines the consistency of responses in mixed-method designs; second, it does so with a particular focus on older people, both with and without cognitive impairments, living in care institutions. The empirical basis consists of 135 semi-structured interviews with individuals aged 50 to 92, conducted in residential homes for the elderly. We compare responses to open, narrative questions with those to closed questions on three topics: quality of life, decision to move, and cognitive decline. We conclude that responses on the same topic are generally consistent, although declining cognitive ability reduces this consistency. With this article we contribute to the discussion on the feasibility of surveying older (institutionalised) people with and without cognitive impairment, as well as the potential and benefits of combining qualitative and quantitative data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Döbler et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37964fe01fead37c58dfhttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2026.v20i1.8500
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper