PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Advances in respiratory medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Exercise-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
JSJanne Marques SilveiraANAna Paula Midori NakaishiMSMarcos Gontijo da Silva

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation on functional exercise capacity and quality of life in adults with long COVID.
  • Reviewed randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies
  • Synthesized evidence from published research between November 2019 and January 2026
  • Analyzed outcomes including functional exercise capacity and quality of life metrics
  • Fifteen studies included with a total of 803 individuals
  • Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation significantly improved functional exercise capacity by 53.72 meters on the 6MWT
  • Quality of life scores improved both physically (MD: 8.04) and mentally (MD: 6.60) in randomized controlled trials
  • Exertional dyspnea levels decreased significantly
  • Fatigue showed a trend toward improvement but with varying assessment tools

Abstract

Background/Objective: A substantial proportion of infected individuals develop persistent symptoms after the acute phase of COVID-19, regardless of initial disease severity. Long COVID (LC) remains a public health challenge characterized by impaired functional exercise capacity (FEC) and quality of life (QoL). We systematically synthesized evidence on the effects of in-person outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (OPR) with individualized and supervised exercise in adults with LC. Methods: Following PROSPERO (CRD42023389365), this study reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies (OCSs) published between November 2019 and January 2026 in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, and EMBASE. Results: Fifteen studies (n = 803) were included. OPR improved FEC (6MWT; MD: 53.72 m, 95% CI 43.69–63.75) and 30″SST (MD: 4.68, 95% CI 3.59–5.77) and reduced exertional dyspnea. RCTs showed benefits in physical (MD: 8.04, 95% CI 3.02–13.05) and mental QoL (MD: 6.60, 95% CI 2.01–11.18) and dyspnea impact, with inconsistent PF findings. Fatigue showed a trend toward improvement but was measured using heterogeneous patient-reported tools in RCTs and OCSs. Conclusions: Supervised PR improves FEC, QoL, and dyspnea in individuals with LC. In patients with fatigue/PEM, systematic assessment and continuous symptom monitoring are essential. High-quality controlled studies are needed to strengthen evidence and clinical guide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silveira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37964fe01fead37c5936https://doi.org/10.3390/arm94020025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper