PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Healthcare0 citationsOpen Access

“It Was Traumatizing, Because It Makes You Feel Like You Are Not Right”: 2S/LGBTQIA+ Survivors’ Experiences Accessing Care for Intimate Partner Violence-Caused Brain Injury

View Full Paper
ECEmily S. ChisholmTSTori N. Stranges

Key Points

  • This study explores how stigma and institutional trust impact 2S/LGBTQIA+ survivors' ability to seek help following brain injuries caused by intimate partner violence.
  • Conducted four semi-structured focus groups with 29 2S/LGBTQIA+ IPV-BI survivors
  • Utilized reflexive thematic analysis to examine help-seeking experiences
  • Examined the roles of minority stress and intersecting stigmas
  • Participants expressed that compounded stigmas limited their access to safe services
  • Institutional trust was crucial for sharing sensitive information
  • Confidentiality was a key factor affecting perceived safety during help-seeking

Abstract

2S/LGBTQIA+ survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) face multiple, intersecting barriers to accessing care, yet little is known about how these barriers are shaped by IPV-caused brain injury (IPV-BI). Background/Objectives: This study aimed to explore how stigma and institutional trust influence 2S/LGBTQIA+ survivors’ experiences of help-seeking following IPV-BI. Guided by a Community Advisory Board, four semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 29 2S/LGBTQIA+ IPV-BI survivors. Methods: Reflexive thematic analysis was used to examine participants’ help-seeking accounts, with attention to minority stress and intersecting stigmas related to IPV, BI, and 2S/LGBTQIA+ identity. Results: The findings indicate that survivors navigated compounded stigmas that limited access to safe, affirming services and heightened vulnerability during help-seeking. Institutional trust was central to participants’ decisions to disclose sensitive information and engage in care, with confidentiality emerging as a critical determinant of perceived safety. Participants described negotiating disclosure, anticipating discrimination, and avoiding services when systems were perceived as unsafe or unresponsive. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for service systems to integrate IPV-BI into screening and support protocols, provide training on the intersections of IPV, BI, and 2S/LGBTQIA+ identities, and centre confidentiality as a condition for trust and access, ultimately fostering safer, more responsive systems of care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chisholm et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37b04fe01fead37c5ae1https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14080997
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceived legal protection and institutional trust predict a lower psychological distress level for transgender people in Aotearoa/New Zealand2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Characterizing Intimate Partner Violence-Caused Brain Injury in a Sample of Survivors in the Two Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning Community2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Brain injury in battered women.2003 · 228 citations
  4. 4Essentials of thematic analysis.2021 · 274 citations
  5. 5Conceptualizing Stigma2001 · 8,681 citations