PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026The Aeronautical Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Principles for ‘intelligent assistant’ systems in future flight deck design: autonomous action integration to reduce pilot workload

DSD. W. SaundersJBJames BlundellWLWen-Chin Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess an intelligent assistant system for assisting pilots during engine failures and incapacitation events.
  • Evaluated intelligent assistant design with four professional pilots.
  • Split pilots into two groups to perform multiple scenarios.
  • Varied three modalities (visual, auditory, physical) across scenarios.
  • Gathered participant feedback regarding task interaction and transparency.
  • Identified limitations in current human-machine interaction design.
  • Highlighted issues with audio prompts overlapping with other stimuli.
  • Noted that pilot reliance on the system varied with task demands.
  • Generated considerations for future designs of intelligent assistant systems.

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of advanced automation and human-artificial intelligence (AI) teaming is expected to permit more efficient use of airspace in the face of increasing air transport demand. Additionally, the development of next-generation aircraft to support net-zero has introduced more complexity into the future flight deck and informational requirements. This study evaluates a design for an ‘intelligent assistant’ system that could share tasks with the pilot during engine failure and pilot incapacitation events, promoting greater reliance on system interaction as workload increases. Four professional pilots were split into two groups to perform six and eight scenarios, respectively. The aim was to identify the task-related information for the designed system to promote transparency to the pilots. Three modalities varied across each scenario (visual, auditory and physical) to evaluate the combination of modality to increase pilot monitoring and interaction with the system. Analysis of participant feedback indicated key limitations to existing human-machine-interaction design, with current operational procedures creating disparity between the system and pilots’ authority to handle the scenario. Additionally, the use of audio narration was negatively received by participants, primarily due to the potential overlap between other audio stimuli, masking the perception of task-critical audio prompts and delaying critical flight tasks from being performed. Design considerations were generated for future ‘intelligent assistant’ systems, with further research required to understand the effect of each modality on pilot reliance on these ‘intelligent assistant’ systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saunders et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db38274fe01fead37c6641https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2026.10161
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artificial Intelligence in Flight Safety: Fatigue Monitoring and Risk Mitigation Technologies2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Artificial Intelligence on the Digital Flight Deck: A Continuum with Parallel Trajectories2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The Autonomous Flight Deck2026
  4. 4Enabling Human-Autonomy Teaming in Aviation: A Framework to Address Human Factors in Digital Assistants Design2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Agentic Flight Intelligence: A Cognitive-Adaptive Architecture for Personalized Human–AI Teaming in Next-Generation Flight Decks2026