PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Global Strategy Journal2 citations

Political stigmatization across US host government agencies and strategic responses by Chinese MNEs

View Full Paper
DPDan Prud'hommeSFStav FainshmidtNHNianchen Han

Key Points

  • To understand the political risks faced by Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the US and how these risks vary across government agencies.
  • Analysis of organizational stigma theory
  • Conceptual framework on audience-specific and cross-audience tipping points
  • Examination of strategies for firms to manage political labeling
  • Severe decoupling occurs at cross-audience tipping points for political labeling.
  • Lesser decoupling relates to audience-specific tipping points.
  • Firms can influence decoupling outcomes through audience dependence, division, and diminution strategies.

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary Chinese MNEs face political risks from decoupling policies, particularly in the United States. Prior research explains when such policies arise but pays limited attention to divergent or conflicting treatment of the same firm by different government agencies within the same host market. Extending organizational stigma theory, we argue that severe decoupling occurs when labeling a firm as politically dangerous reaches a cross‐audience tipping point, while lesser decoupling arises at audience‐specific tipping points. We further conceptualize how such labeling diffuses across agencies and how firms can avoid or slow this process through audience dependence, division, and diminution strategies. Effectiveness depends on which audiences firms prioritize and when they intervene in the labeling process. Managerial Summary Amid intensifying geopolitical rivalries, Chinese multinational enterprises face decoupling risks that can vary across government agencies within the same host country. We explain how such divergent treatment emerges, arguing that severe decoupling occurs when labeling a firm as politically dangerous reaches a cross‐audience tipping point, while more limited measures arise when labeling remains confined to specific agencies. We also show that firms can influence these outcomes by actively managing how political labels spread through audience dependence, division, and diminution strategies. Our perspective highlights that successfully managing political risk depends on which audiences firms prioritize and when they intervene in the labeling process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prud'homme et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db383b4fe01fead37c66c5https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.70015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper