Abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by O₂ commonly occurs in the presence of mineral sorbents and organic matter (OM) in soils and sediments; however, this tertiary system has rarely been studied. Therefore, we examined the impacts of mineral surfaces (goethite and γ-Al₂O₃) and organic matter [Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA)] on Fe(II) oxidation rates and the resulting Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides under 21 and 1% pO₂ at pH 6. We tracked Fe dynamics by adding ⁵⁷Fe(II) to ⁵⁶Fe-labeled goethite and γ-Al₂O₃ and characterized the resulting solids using ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. We found Fe(II) oxidation was slower at low pO₂ and resulted in higher-crystallinity Fe(III) phases. Relative to oxidation of Fe(II)(aq) alone, both goethite and γ-Al₂O₃ surfaces increased Fe(II) oxidation rates regardless of pO₂ levels, with goethite being the stronger catalyst. Goethite surfaces promoted the formation of crystalline goethite, while γ-Al₂O₃ favored nano/small particle or disordered goethite and some lepidocrocite; oxidation of Fe(II)aq alone favored lepidocrocite. SRFA reduced oxidation rates in all treatments except the mineral-free systems at 21% pO₂, and SRFA decreased Fe(III) phase crystallinity, facilitating low-crystalline ferrihydrite in the absence of mineral sorbents, low-crystalline lepidocrocite in the presence of γ-Al₂O₃, but either crystalline goethite or ferrihydrite when goethite was present. This work highlights that the oxidation rate, the types of mineral surfaces, and OM control Fe(III) precipitate composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: