Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although scientists typically insist that their research is very exciting and adventurous when they talk to laymen and prospective students, the allure of this enthusiasm is too often lost in the predictable, stilted structure and language of their scientific publications. I present here, a top‐10 list of recommendations for how to write consistently boring scientific publications. I then discuss why we should and how we could make these contributions more accessible and exciting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaj Sand‐Jensen (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: