Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The claim of quantum cryptography has always been that it can provide protocols that are unconditionally secure, that is, for which the security does not depend on any restriction on the time, space, or technology available to the cheaters. We show that this claim does not hold for any quantum bit commitment protocol. Since many cryptographic tasks use bit commitment as a basic primitive, this result implies a severe setback for quantum cryptography. The model used encompasses all reasonable implementations of quantum bit commitment protocols in which the participants have not met before, including those that make use of the theory of special relativity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dominic Mayers (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: