Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modern theories of electrolyte solutions are physically accurate but difficult to apply for real-life systems; a need therefore exists to theoretically derive simplified and practically useful mathematical expressions for thermodynamic excess functions. This can be done by incorporating ion-size dissimilarity into the classical Debye-Hückel model [Physik Z. 24, 185 (1923)], under conditions at which non-electrostatic contributions are negligible. If the contact distance between the central (β) ion and a cloud (α) ion is a for counter-ions and b for co-ions, two basic cases exist, b < a and b > a. In both, a ‘smaller-ion shell’ (SiS) at the edge of the ionic cloud, bordered by the spherical surfaces of radius b and a, admits only the smaller α ions [Thomlinson and Outhwaite, Mol. Phys. 47, 1113 (1982)]. In the b < a case, the SiS contributes an ionic repulsion effect and the overall extra-electrostatic potential energy, Ψ b < a (κ) − κ, reciprocal screening length–exhibits a minimum. For b > a, the SiS contributes an ‘extra ionic attraction’ and the overall extra-electrostatic energy, Ψ b > a (κ) declines monotonically with increasing κ. The entire Ψ contribution, Ψ±, is a linear combination of the Ψs of the two counter β ions. The effectiveness of Ψ± is demonstrated for real-life electrolyte systems, based on experimental mean ionic activity coefficients and their concentration dependencies. Fitting theory with experiment generates ion-size parameters that represent realistic interionic collision distances in solution, unlike parallel parameters based on other simplified theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dan Fraenkel (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: