Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with NCCN very low and low risk prostate cancer genomic scores did not demonstrate meaningfully significant differences by volume based on clinically established cutoff points. Moreover, genomic scores identified and reclassified men with higher risk disease despite generally acceptable surveillance characteristics in this group according to grade and volume. This suggests that in patients at low risk the tumor biological potential measured by genomics rather than by volume should inform decisions on active surveillance candidacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nyame et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: