Why the study?
To review the literature on machine learning applications in soccer, focusing on injury risk assessment, and provide practical tips for club health and performance staff.
Machine learning currently has limited predictive ability for soccer injuries but may help identify early signs of elevated musculoskeletal injury risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current ML models lack sensitivity for reliable soccer injury prediction and should not yet change practice; leaves open need for refined algorithms and prospective validation.
This narrative review paper aimed to discuss the literature on machine learning applications in soccer with an emphasis on injury risk assessment. A secondary aim was to provide practical tips for the health and performance staff in soccer clubs on how machine learning can provide a competitive advantage. Performance analysis is the area with the majority of research so far. Other domains of soccer science and medicine with machine learning use are injury risk assessment, players' workload and wellness monitoring, movement analysis, players' career trajectory, club performance, and match attendance. Regarding injuries, which is a hot topic, machine learning does not seem to have a high predictive ability at the moment (models specificity ranged from 74.2%-97.7%. sensitivity from 15.2%-55.6% with area under the curve of 0.66-0.83). It seems, though, that machine learning can help to identify the early signs of elevated risk for a musculoskeletal injury. Future research should account for musculoskeletal injuries' dynamic nature for machine learning to provide more meaningful results for practitioners in soccer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nassis et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: