There are many articles in the literature dealing with the first-order and the second-order differential subordination and superordination problems for analytic functions in the unit disk, but only a few articles are dealing with the above problems in the third-order case (see, e.g., Antonino and Miller (2011) and Ponnusamy et al. (1992)). The concept of the third-order differential subordination in the unit disk was introduced by Antonino and Miller in (2011). Let Ω be a set in the complex planeC. Also letpbe analytic in the unit diskU=z:z∈C and z<1and suppose thatψ:C4×U→C. In this paper, we investigate the problem of determining properties of functionsp(z)that satisfy the following third-order differential superordination:Ω⊂ψpz,zp′z,z2p′′z,z3p′′′z;z:z∈U. As applications, we derive some third-order differential subordination and superordination results for meromorphically multivalent functions, which are defined by a family of convolution operators involving the Liu-Srivastava operator. The results are obtained by considering suitable classes of admissible functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: